🔍 Read the full analysis: Microsoft Earned A Warm Response While Alphabet Got A Cooler One on ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Get the little things that make your day delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
TL;DR
Microsoft shares rose about 4% in after-hours trading after its October 28 results, while Alphabet shares fell about 10%. Alphabet’s Google Cloud grew faster than Azure, but Alphabet reported negative free cash flow and missed analyst forecasts; Microsoft posted positive free cash flow and beat expectations. Both companies said AI computing capacity remains constrained.
Microsoft shares rose about 4% and Alphabet shares fell about 10% in after-hours trading after the companies reported results on October 28, as investors weighed Microsoft’s earnings beat and positive free cash flow against Alphabet’s faster cloud growth but negative cash flow and missed forecasts. The contrast matters because both are spending heavily to expand AI computing capacity, while the companies say demand exceeds available supply.
Microsoft reported quarterly revenue of $92.3 billion, up 19%, and adjusted earnings per share of $4.89, above the $4.73 analysts polled by LSEG had expected, according to CNBC. Azure revenue increased 48% to $33.2 billion, exceeding the 45% growth rate Microsoft had guided in July. It was the first quarter in which Microsoft disclosed Azure revenue in dollars, according to the source report.
Alphabet’s Google Cloud revenue rose 103% to $30.7 billion, more than twice Azure’s growth rate. But Alphabet missed analyst forecasts for revenue, earnings per share and search advertising, CNBC reported. The source report described this as Alphabet’s first miss on both revenue and profit in nearly four years. The companies’ cloud figures and share moves show the split between operating growth and the cash investors see available after investment.
Microsoft reported $18.6 billion in free cash flow for the quarter, while Alphabet reported negative $9.1 billion, its second consecutive negative quarter, according to the source material. Alphabet raised $28.7 billion through bonds and $12.4 billion by issuing shares during the quarter and did not buy back shares. Microsoft did not issue new bonds during the period, the report said. Those financing details help explain why investors may have focused on the cost of growth as well as its pace.
The spending figures need care because the companies report investment in different ways. Microsoft recorded $45.2 billion in capital spending including finance leases, while cash paid for property and equipment was $39.4 billion, twice the $19.4 billion a year earlier. The cash figure was below analyst expectations of $50.7 billion, according to StreetAccount figures cited by CNBC. Microsoft CFO Amy Hood said some expected third-party capacity deliveries were delayed. The source says about three-quarters of Microsoft’s capital spending went toward short-lived assets such as GPUs and CPUs.
For Alphabet, the source report put 2026 capital spending guidance at $195 billion to $205 billion, unchanged, with a substantial increase expected in 2027. Microsoft’s 2026 plan was listed at about $170 billion, compared with roughly $175 billion in July, while delayed deliveries are expected to shift some investment into the first half of 2027. Both firms have large contracted cloud backlogs: $677 billion at Microsoft and $561 billion at Google Cloud. Those commitments are future contracted revenue, not cash already received.
Infographic 01 · The scorecard
Same night, opposite verdicts.
The four numbers from my 28 October preview, scored with both companies’ own reports for July to September 2026.
The four numbers I said to watch, scored
Status chips: ok = healthy, hold = watch, urgent = warning sign. My assessment.
| Metric | Microsoft | Alphabet |
|---|---|---|
| 1 · Capex guidance | Microsoft hold About $170B for calendar 2026 (July: about $175B), lower only because deliveries slipped. More than $50B next quarter. | Alphabet hold $195–205B for 2026, unchanged. 2027 to “increase significantly”; no number yet. |
| 2 · Cloud growth vs. capex | Microsoft hold Azure +48%. Capex incl. finance leases +30%; cash capex about 2×. | Alphabet hold Google Cloud +103%. Capex +114% to $51.4B. |
| 3 · Free cash flow + funding | Microsoft ok +$18.6B (−27%). No new bonds. $10.2B returned to shareholders. | Alphabet urgent −$9.1B. $28.7B bonds and $12.4B new shares in the quarter. No buybacks. |
| 4 · Capacity | Microsoft hold “Demand continues to exceed available supply.” Delayed GPU capacity moves to the first half of 2027. | Alphabet hold “Supply constrained.” Renting third-party capacity; margin pressure ahead. |
Microsoft
≈ +4%After-hours, 28 Oct (CNBC; Reuters: more than 5%)
- Beat on revenue ($92.3B, +19%) and earnings per share ($4.89 adjusted vs. $4.73 expected)
- Azure guide 49–50% for the current quarter
- Self-funded build-out
Alphabet
≈ −10%After-hours, 28 Oct (CNBC, Reuters)
- Missed on revenue ($127.6B vs. $128.2B expected) and earnings ($2.67 adjusted vs. $3.02)
- Search +12%, below forecasts; AI Mode earns less per query so far
- Build-out now partly financed with bonds and new shares
Sources: Microsoft FY27 Q1 release and call, 28 Oct 2026; Alphabet Q3 2026 release (8-K), 28 Oct 2026; Alphabet Q3 call, third-party transcript; CNBC on Microsoft, 28 Oct; CNBC on Alphabet, 28 Oct; Reuters, 28 Oct. Analyst expectations as reported by CNBC and Reuters (LSEG, StreetAccount). Capex growth for Alphabet and Microsoft’s cash capex: my arithmetic from the cash flow statements. Status chips: Thorsten Meyer.
Powered by Thorsten Meyer AI
Cash Flow Shapes AI Spending Verdicts
The market response suggests investors were looking beyond headline cloud growth to ask how each company is financing its AI buildout. Alphabet’s 103% Google Cloud growth was faster than Azure’s 48%, but its negative free cash flow and reliance on debt and new share issuance raised questions about the near-term funding burden. Microsoft, by contrast, generated positive free cash flow while beating the cited earnings and revenue expectations.
This is not proof that one company will ultimately win the AI market. The after-hours moves capture investors’ initial reaction to one set of results, not a settled judgment on long-term returns. Large data-center investments can support future services and revenue, but the timing and cost of capacity matter: spending may precede revenue, and contracted backlogs take time to convert into recognized sales and cash.
Both companies also face constraints that limit how quickly they can meet demand. Microsoft said some equipment deliveries were delayed, while Alphabet has started renting capacity from outside providers, according to the source report. That means strong demand and large order books do not automatically translate into immediate growth in available computing capacity.
Products Worth Considering
Fitbit Sense Advanced Smartwatch – Sage Grey/Silver (One Size, S & L Bands Included)
Garmin Forerunner 70 GPS Running Smartwatch, 43 mm, Black
TheraGun Relief Massage Gun – 3 Speed, Black
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Two Results, Different Investor Signals
The results were released after the U.S. market closed on October 28, and the contrasting share moves were reported the following day. Microsoft’s quarter was its first quarter of fiscal 2027 because its fiscal year begins in July. Alphabet’s cloud business grew much faster by percentage, but its overall results included a forecast miss in several areas, according to CNBC’s figures cited by the source.
Microsoft’s commercial remaining performance obligation, a measure of contracted revenue not yet recognized, rose 73% to $677 billion. The source report says about 30% is expected to become revenue within 12 months and that the average contract duration is 2.3 years. Alphabet’s Google Cloud backlog was reported at $561 billion. These figures indicate substantial future commitments, but they do not show when customers will use the services or when the companies will collect the associated cash.
The source report also noted customer concentration at Microsoft: its quarterly filing recorded $10 billion in revenue from OpenAI, including revenue-sharing payments. It also identified weakness in Windows, where revenue from PC makers fell 27%, citing weaker PC demand and a comparison with the prior year’s Windows 10 deadline. Those details offer additional context for Microsoft’s results, but the immediate market contrast in the report centered on earnings, cash flow and AI-related spending.
“Some third-party capacity deliveries we expected in Q1 were delayed.”
— Microsoft CFO Amy Hood, as quoted on the company’s earnings call
Delivery Timing and Returns Remain Open
The reported figures do not establish whether either company’s AI investments will generate returns sufficient to cover their costs. Backlogs represent contracted commitments, but much of that revenue remains to be recognized, and the timing of customer usage, delivery and payment is not fully specified in the source material.
Microsoft said delayed equipment deliveries would move some planned capacity into a later period. Hood expects capital spending above $50 billion in the current quarter and an acceleration in the first half of 2027, according to the source report. Alphabet’s stated plans point to higher spending in 2027, but the material does not provide a detailed schedule for how quickly its rented capacity or new infrastructure will become available.
The source material gives the after-hours share moves but does not identify the exact closing prices, the duration of the moves or how the stocks traded in subsequent sessions. It also does not establish that cash flow alone caused the market reaction. Earnings misses, guidance, spending plans and broader investor expectations may all have contributed.
Spending Plans Face Near-Term Tests
Investors will have further evidence to assess when Microsoft reports the results of its current quarter, including whether capital spending rises above Hood’s stated expectation of $50 billion and whether delayed equipment deliveries arrive. The company also expects spending to accelerate in the first half of 2027, making delivery timing and free cash flow key figures to watch.
For Alphabet, coming results will show whether Google Cloud’s rapid revenue growth can continue alongside its planned investment and whether free cash flow improves from the reported negative $9.1 billion. The source material does not give a specific date for the next earnings reports or a revised outlook beyond the spending guidance discussed.
Both companies say demand for AI computing exceeds supply. Their next updates should clarify whether capacity constraints ease, how much investment is required to address them, and whether cloud growth converts into cash at a pace investors find sustainable. Until then, the October results offer a snapshot of two fast-growing cloud businesses with different cash-flow positions, not a final verdict on the returns from AI spending.
Key Questions
Why did Microsoft shares rise while Alphabet shares fell?
The source report says Microsoft beat analyst expectations for revenue and earnings and reported $18.6 billion in free cash flow. Alphabet’s Google Cloud grew faster, but Alphabet missed forecasts for revenue, earnings per share and search advertising and reported negative $9.1 billion in free cash flow. The figures provide context for the different after-hours moves, but they do not prove what caused every investor’s decision.
Did Google Cloud grow faster than Azure?
Yes. Google Cloud revenue rose 103% to $30.7 billion, while Azure revenue grew 48% to $33.2 billion, according to the source material. The companies’ reported growth rates and revenue figures are not the same as a comparison of profitability or cash generated.
How much did the companies spend on AI infrastructure?
The source lists Microsoft’s 2026 capital spending plan at about $170 billion and Alphabet’s at $195 billion to $205 billion. Microsoft reported $45.2 billion in quarterly capital spending including finance leases, while cash paid for property and equipment was $39.4 billion. The figures use different reporting measures and should not be treated as directly interchangeable.
Are Microsoft and Alphabet meeting demand for AI computing?
Not fully, according to the source report. Both companies said demand exceeds supply; Microsoft cited delayed GPU deliveries, while Alphabet has begun renting capacity from third parties. The material does not specify when the shortages will end.
Do the cloud backlogs represent money already earned?
No. The reported $677 billion Microsoft backlog and $561 billion Google Cloud backlog are contracted revenue commitments that have not yet been recognized as revenue. They do not mean the full amounts have already been delivered, collected or converted into cash.
Source: ThorstenMeyerAI.com
